Most third-level undergraduate students are required to
write essays as a form of assessment. In these essays, it could be argued that
the students are expected by those correcting the essay to adhere to certain
language norms as well as to display appropriate knowledge. In disciplines of
study of which students have no prior academic experience, of which, in
Ireland, Philosophy is one, they have no discourse expectations, even at a
lexical level, when they begin the course in first year. With time, as the
students are exposed to lectures, tutorials, readings and lecture handouts,
they develop some discourse expectations and use these when producing their own
writing for assessment. However, not all students adhere to the language norms
they have should have intuited from their interaction within the discipline.
Some may argue that the failure to replicate the appropriate language norms
results in a lower grade. This paper uses a corpus of 60 first-year
undergraduate Philosophy essays collected over two semesters to investigate
whether there are vocabulary differences between those essays which receive
higher grades and those which receive lower grades. The implications of these
findings for EAP pedagogy will also be examined. |